Neurology — continuous care programmesContinuous care
for neurology.
Built by a vascular neurologist, on the workflows he ran himself — blood-pressure control after stroke, adherence between visits, and cognitive change tracked over time rather than recalled at an appointment.
What applies here, and why.
Which programme suits a given panel is a clinical and documentation decision. This is the shape we see most often — treat it as a starting point for a conversation, not a prescription.
- Blood pressure, for secondary stroke prevention
- Medication adherence between appointments
- Cognitive performance, tracked serially rather than at a single visit
The question is not whether one reading is high — it is whether this patient's control is drifting in a direction that changes their risk. Thresholds are set per patient by the treating clinician, not by a global default.
How it runs
Devices ship cellular and ready to use. Readings and monitoring time land in the chart, and the clinical team escalates against the thresholds the neurologist sets — not a generic alert band.
Thresholds set by the physician, not by a default.
Escalation logic, alert bands, and care-plan rules are specified by a physician who has run them — which is why what reaches the chart is clinically meaningful rather than raw telemetry.
A threshold that fires on every patient is noise, and noise gets ignored. The escalation rules are written per patient, by the clinician who knows what a change actually means for them.
Codes that commonly apply.
What each one requires, and what it pays, lives in the CPT reference — one source, so nothing drifts.
Run this in your neurology practice. We will tell you what it takes.
Tell us your panel and the system you run. We will be straight about which programme fits and what the documentation actually requires.