Wound Care — continuous care programmesBetween-visit care
for wound care.
Wound patients are seen often and managed constantly in between. Monitoring and care management make those weeks visible — and billable — without adding visits.
What applies here, and why.
Which programme suits a given panel is a clinical and documentation decision. This is the shape we see most often — treat it as a starting point for a conversation, not a prescription.
- Adherence to offloading, dressing, and therapy instructions
- Patient-reported symptoms between visits
- The comorbidities driving healing — glycaemic and vascular control
Wound deterioration is usually visible in adherence and symptom trend before the next scheduled visit. The programme is built so that signal reaches someone who can act on it.
How it runs
Which programme fits a wound panel is a clinical and documentation question — RTM and CCM carry different requirements. We will tell you which applies to your workflow before you build around it.
Thresholds set by the physician, not by a default.
Escalation logic, alert bands, and care-plan rules are specified by a physician who has run them — which is why what reaches the chart is clinically meaningful rather than raw telemetry.
A threshold that fires on every patient is noise, and noise gets ignored. The escalation rules are written per patient, by the clinician who knows what a change actually means for them.
Codes that commonly apply.
What each one requires, and what it pays, lives in the CPT reference — one source, so nothing drifts.
Run this in your wound care practice. We will tell you what it takes.
Tell us your panel and the system you run. We will be straight about which programme fits and what the documentation actually requires.